In hot tapping, a fitting with an isolation valve is applied to a pressurized, in service line, usually welded, in some cases clamped. The wall is then drilled under full operating pressure with a dedicated machine. The severed piece of material, the coupon, is safely retained. The valve stays in place as a permanent connection.
The purpose is stated simply: create a new connection without shutting the plant down and without draining the system. No standstill, no production loss, no major shutdown. This is where the commercial appeal comes from, and this is where the risk comes from that the construction codes do not capture.
Construction codes such as ASME B31.3 or EN 13480 describe how a line is designed and built. Procedure standards such as API 2201 and ASME PCC-2, Article 2.11, describe how a tap on a suitable component is executed cleanly. Both assume an intact, specification compliant starting condition.
On site, however, the fresh line from the datasheet is rarely what you face. You face a line that has been in service for ten, twenty or thirty years, with real wall loss, a welding history, and a medium that has changed the material. The question is then no longer how to tap. The question is whether this specific component qualifies at all in its actual condition.
None of these standards answers that question conclusively. It sits between manufacturing code and operational responsibility. This is the liability vacuum that FRALEX closes systematically. Not with a new material, but with a traceable decision.
FRALEX GLSC turns the experienced technician gut feeling into a testable structure. Before every hot tap there are six questions whose answers are documented and owned.
Not the nominal value counts, but the actually measured wall thickness in the planned weld and drill area. Too little remaining thickness means the welding heat is not safely dissipated into material and medium. The result is burn through, an uncontrolled release exactly where the work is happening.
The material on the datasheet and the material after years in the medium are not the same. Carbon equivalent, embrittlement and hydrogen cracking decide whether an in service weld is permissible at all. This assessment needs a qualified procedure, not routine.
A stable flow carries the introduced heat away and protects against burn through. If the medium is static or the flow is unstable, the entire risk picture shifts. In certain configurations, the absence of flow alone is a reason for a no go.
Composition, ignition temperature, reactivity and possible deposits determine which procedures are permissible and which protective measures become mandatory. A flammable or reactive medium shifts the line between acceptable and irresponsible significantly.
Who stands where when the wall is breached. The live intervention takes place on an active pressure boundary. Assessing personnel exposure is part of the decision, not an appendix after it.
Whoever owns a live intervention must be able to justify it afterwards. If the reliable basis for the condition is missing, the basis for the release is missing. A cleanly documented no go is legally stronger than an undocumented go that happened to work out.
The first five rows say how to build, inspect and tap. The last row says whether you may do it here and now. Integrity is a decision, not a material property.
Short, reliable answers to the questions that come up before every hot tap. For the full logic: the GLSC in the Veritas Library.
When a live intervention is due and the release has to be owned, FRALEX structures the decision. Directly with Frank Havemann.